Subject	Ok, it was probably more like 7400, JWT ECU = higher redline
Posted by	Z_PREPared on April 17, 2003 at 2:13 PM
	This message has been viewed 46 times.
In Reply To	7500 -- 7600 rpm (n/m) posted by Z_PREPared on April 17, 2003 at 09:55 AM
Message	I thought the NA had 4.11 rearend gears. All I know is the car felt like it was still making good power and I think shifting into fourth would have dropped the RPM and hence horsepower more than me staying in 3rd. Steve
Follow Ups	My new best NA 1/4 mile time - Z_PREPared 00:49:30 04/17/03 60 foot is not bad for an NA. (n/m) - govaardz(Aruba) 08:57:36 04/17/03 how high rpms was it in 3rd at 96mph in an n/a!???? (n/m) - shawnc 09:49:45 04/17/03 7500 -- 7600 rpm (n/m) - Z_PREPared 09:55:24 04/17/03 um. Thats well over redline. (n/m) - Guapo 11:12:57 04/17/03 Is there any power up there? (n/m) - Kenny (10 psi) 11:13:48 04/17/03 the power dives after 6.5/6.6k rpm. (n/m) - Halo Z 12:10:31 04/17/03 3rd gear, 4.08 rear end = 97mph, redline at 7000rpm. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 13:58:10 04/17/03 Unless you used 245/40/18's then 101mph in 3rd to redline. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 14:02:38 04/17/03 Ok, it was probably more like 7400, JWT ECU = higher redline - Z_PREPared 14:13:49 04/17/03 i also find that the tach is a tad high compared to my AFC (n/m) - Guapo 15:42:36 04/17/03 alamo or river city?? - Halo Z 09:51:55 04/17/03 River City was recently renamed San Antonio Raceway - Z_PREPared 10:01:02 04/17/03 i ran simular trap and ETs on re730s at 38 psi at alamoDW - Halo Z 12:09:17 04/17/03 not bad man - ENVYMYZ 10:12:42 04/17/03 With all those mods I can only hope for a 15s 1/4mi? =( (n/m) - shirow 11:52:21 04/17/03 cheer up. They say I should be able to get down to 14.5 - Z_PREPared 14:21:26 04/17/03 Kuhmos=suck for racing (n/m) - down5hift 12:32:50 04/17/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.